1. Home
  2. Vol 20, No 2 (2025)
  3. Daulay

THE ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE ON SYMBOLIC INTERACTION THEORY

Mahmud Yunus Daulay, Rubino Rubino, Mailin Mailin

Abstract


The discussion of symbolic interaction emphasizes more on the motives underlying human actions. Symbolic interaction states that all human actions are based on two motives, namely the motive for (in order to motive) and the motive because (because to motive). Both motives are in the mind of a person who does the act and no one else knows. In Islam, this motive can be called the intention that underlies the act. This intention is important because it is the cause of the acceptance or rejection of an action. Therefore, it is necessary to critique this theory from the perspective of Islamic communication. The results of the criticism of this theory from an Islamic perspective are, first, behavior must be carried out with good motives and intended because of God as the owner of power. Although sometimes in life, there are also many motivations for human behavior that are for other than God. Second, human behavior is not entirely born of his will, but there is also God's will in it. Third, Islam recommends that confirmation be carried out to see the motives of actions.

Keywords


Perspective, Islam and Theory

References


Ahmadi, Dadi. "Symbolic Interaction: An Introduction." MEDIATOR 9, no. 2 (208 AD).

Ahmadi, Dadi. "Symbolic Interaction: An Introduction." Mediator: Journal of Communication 9, no. 2 (2008): 301–16. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v9i2.1115.

Al Barry, M. Dahlan. Popular Scientific Dictionary. Arkola, 1994.

Asfar, A.M.Irfan, Andi Muhamad Asfar, and Mercy Halamury. BEHAVIORISM THEORY (Theory of Behaviorism). 2019. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34507.44324.

Blumer, Herbert. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press, 1986.

Citraningsih, Diningrum, and Hanifah Noviandari. “Symbolic Interactionism: The Role of Leadership in Decision Making.” Social Science Studies 2, no. 1 (2022): 072–086. https://doi.org/10.47153/sss21.3152022.

EBSCO. “George Herbert Mead | Research Starters | EBSCO Research.” Accessed December 1, 2025. https://www.ebsco.com.

Effendy, Onong Uchjana. Dictionary of Communication. Mandar Maju, 1989.

Hariyanto, Didik. Introduction to Communication Science Textbook. UMSIDA Press, 2021.

Hasbullah, Abdur Rouf, Nur Ahid, and Sutrisno. “The Application of Symbolic Interaction Theory and Social Change in the Digital Age.” At-Tahdzib: Journal of Islamic Studies and Muamalah 10, no. 1 (2022): 36–49.

K. Garna., Judistira. Social Sciences, Fundamentals-Concepts-Positions. Primaco Akademika, 1999.

M.A, Dr Sumanto. General Psychology. Media Pressindo, 2014.

Maraya, Yunan Irham. "The Meaning of Love Services at the Technical Service Unit of the Surabaya Institute of Technology Library." Thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA, 2015. http://lib.unair.ac.id.

Mulyana, Deddy. Communication Science: An Introduction. Rosda Karya, 2002.

Rahmawati, Rahmawati. "A Study of Symbolic Interaction in the Tradition of Reciting and Completing the Qur'an Among the Mandar People in Letawa Village, Sarjo District, Pasangkayu Regency." Diploma, IAIN Palu, 2021. http://repository.iainpalu.ac.id/id/eprint/1093/.

RAHO, Bernard. Modern Sociology Theory (Revised Edition). Ledalero Publisher, 2021. http://repository.iftkledalero.ac.id/309/.

Sukarno, Mahattama Banteng. Understanding Symbols (An Introduction to the Symbolic Interactionism Paradigm—George Herbert Mead). Deepublish, 2025.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28944/reflektika.v20i2.2274

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.