Transparansi Anggaran Publik Sebagai Kunci Peningkatan Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap Pemerintah Daerah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28944/assyarikah.v5i2.1891Keywords:
Public Budget Transparency, Public Trust, Local Government, Pamekasan Regency, QuantitativeAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of public budget transparency on the level of public trust in the Pamekasan Regency Government. Public budget transparency is defined as adequate openness of information related to the budget preparation, implementation, and evaluation process that can be accessed by the public. Public trust is measured based on public perception of the reliability and accountability of the local government in budget management. Using quantitative methods, this study collected data through a survey with a stratified random sampling technique on 400 respondents selected from various regions in Pamekasan Regency. Data analysis was carried out using simple linear regression to determine the relationship between budget transparency variables and public trust. The results showed that budget transparency had a positive and significant effect on the level of public trust with a regression coefficient of 0.625 and a significance value of 0.000. This finding indicates that the higher the level of budget transparency, the greater the public trust in the local government. This study provides important implications for the development of public policy, especially in increasing budget transparency in order to strengthen public trust.
References
Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2006). Transparency, political polarization, and political budget cycles in OECD countries. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 530-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00200.x
Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2019). Transparency to curb corruption? Concepts, measures, and empirical merit. Crime, Law and Social Change, 71(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-018-9783-5
Cochran, W. G. (2007). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Coryn, C. L. S., Noakes, L. A., & Westine, C. D. (2022). Enhancing the legitimacy of government through budget transparency. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(2), 101-119.https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-05-2020-0052
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2020). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 507-519.https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13166
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Heald, D. (2006). Varieties of transparency. Proceedings of the British Academy, 135, 25-43.
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2005). The impact of online transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparison. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 556-567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00492.x
Levi, M. (1998). Consent, dissent, and patriotism. Cambridge University Press.
Lindner, J. R., & Melton, B. L. (2021). Sampling design in social science research. Journal of Research Methodology, 45(3), 229-245.
Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2019). Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. Governance, 22(4), 541-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01451.x
Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30-62.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034001002
Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2012). Introduction to linear regression analysis (5th ed.). Wiley.
Porumbescu, G., Bellé, N., Cucciniello, M., & Nasi, G. (2020). Translating transparency into trust: Experimental evidence from an online transparency platform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 312-327. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz048
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
